18 November 2008 @ 07:18 am
Would you love a monsterman?  
New interview with Wry Ann Duchane up at Kittysneezes! Hooray! Check that shit out!

Speaking of Kittysneezes, I'm thinking I might be taking next week off -- under the guise of it being Thanksgiving; I'll post a couple of older articles to the front page and call it good. Any re-post requests? (Not any of the five that are in the "Most Popular" since those ones already get lots of exposure. And I suppose, preferably none in the "Greatest Hits" rotator box, but that's less a big deal for me, I think.)

One of the things that's always been sort of the Plan With Kittysneezes, I guess, is for it to be a bit more of a magazine-type situation; I mean, part of it was that there wasn't going to be a set roster, like with TODCRA, since that was part of the reason I shot TODCRA in the head -- I got frustrated with being the only TODCRA member who ever seemed to want to do anything. With Kittysneezes, I always figured that if I know that I'm the only one who HAS to post ahead of time, it'll make things easier... and it has! And I'm not sayin' that I want out or anything, far from it.

The main reason I'm taking the week off is basically writers' block/temporarily losing interest in writing all together (it's a cycle, y'know, it's basically always been a cycle, and I think everyone's just about like that). I'm thinking what I need are Assignments Or Something, and I"m trying to figure out the best way to do that. I've got a few ideas for projects, including:

a) Doing reviews of the Criterion Films I've seen (and like); not in order, and not consistently nor even TAGGED as such -- but just so I have a list of stuff I can cross off from.
b) One thing I've been thinking about pitching to the Jandek list -- a series of stories, written by different folks, that take the titles from various Jandek records (luckily, the dude's got a bajillion of 'em) and basically take that as a prompt. Unlike the Criterion one, I haven't moved on this at all (the only reason, however, I've moved on that one is because I just watch a lot of Criterions and have reviewed them in my normal, um, reviewin'. I've only recently thought of making that a "project".)
c) One I started for a blog a long, long time ago, but I don't think this one works very well -- using Eno's Oblique Strategies as a writing prompt. While I like the idea, particularly as an everyone-who-wants-to-thing-where-people-will-even-get-a-same-strategy-which-plays-into-my-whole-thing-of-different-people-doing-the-same-thing-differently, I've found that a lot of the Oblique Strategies are a little too vague as a STARTING PLACE, and, only work, well, as they're intended, as a way to look at an EXISTING idea in a new way. (I HAVE used them for that -- a handful of the Fingertips Project entries were written that way, even.) But yeah. I mean, dang, outside of the introduction post, I didn't even do an entry myself. So, um, wow. Of course, if anyone IS interested and wants to join that blog, more power to you and I'll give you posting access, but, um, yeah.
d) One writing project I often thought of but never did -- taking a dictionary and trying to do a story per each word. Perhaps skipping around, I don't know. Never did anything with this except once photocopying a dictionary page.

ANYWAY, though, yeah.

I think the one thing, however, I would like to do with Kittysneezes, which gets back to my ORIGINAL point above (this lack of organization is perhaps because of my general meh towards sitting down to write right now I guess -- I mean, jeez, this weekend when I wrote the opening paragraph for the Wry Ann interview was basically like bleeding, even though it just had to be basically "HERE'S AN INTERVIEW: READ."), which is that I'd like more, different writers. One thing I thought of is if there were a way to kind of absorb other blogs/attempts-at-magazines-like-mine, but I'm not really sure how to go abouts doin' that, either. I could do a Craigslist ad or something, except:
a) While I don't want to impose a "You Must Only Write In Favor Of Things That I Like", I do kind of want it to be people whose writing I enjoy, so, not just ANYONE, I guess.
b) I can't pay, so that's SO LAME where it's like 'OH YOU SHOULD WRITE FOR ME AND GET FAME AND FORTUNE AND EVERYTHING BUT NO MONEY' cause there's a lot of those kinds of ads, and they are always so fly-by-night and lame and I'd rather just be upfront and go "Um, like, um, if there's any reward, you don't have to pay for hosting. I guess. Unless you want to give me money to help out with that, but that's silly."

And there's always the trust issue, too, of being at least reasonably sure someone's not going to post Goatse to the front page or whatnot.

So, um, yeah. I am open to/asking for ideas.

(Also in the whole thing of getting on media lists. I got on a few press-release lists, but no review copy lists, heh. Which I suppose makes sense, since we ARE pretty dang small potatoes... FOR NOW!!!!!! and most likely forever) So, yes -- help! Ideas! Volunteers! Kittens! Hoboes! Pie!
 
 
Current Music: Don Ellis on my iPod before I leave for werk
 
 
( Post a new comment )
Janet[info]limnrix on November 18th, 2008 10:09 pm (UTC)
I'll definitely have a Best Albums (according only to me in my tiny world) list with commentary, and Best Songs, as well. And I'll write that thing on group dynamics, really I will.
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 19th, 2008 02:53 pm (UTC)
Yaaaay! Alla those would be awesome!

I'm kinda mentally thinking that Josh's ETJ is probably more-or-less what I'm kinda thinking of modelling after. So, you know, if for some reason Josh and his friends want to give up doing stuff on his own site, they totally have a place at Kittysneezes. Even though I can't really imagine why he would. So, just like never mind.
Keith Lawrence[info]kludge on November 19th, 2008 12:05 am (UTC)
I have an idea for a project, but I have to give it some thinks.

Also: Mr. Normal! Holy hell, am I happy to see that! I thought Mr. Duchane had vanished off the face of the earth!
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 19th, 2008 02:54 pm (UTC)
Thinks are good!

Also, yes! And I've been really digging Mr. Normal too. It's funny, because that interview was initially started back when it was gonna be the TODCRA interviews! So, it's kinda funny that it's finally launched! After years! and years and years! And kittens.
Suzumiya Haruhi's Lover[info]the_terrible on November 19th, 2008 01:09 am (UTC)
"writers' block/temporarily losing interest in writing all together (it's a cycle, y'know, it's basically always been a cycle, and I think everyone's just about like that"

Yes. And I've had it for some time now.
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 19th, 2008 02:55 pm (UTC)
I know a lot of is it just sitting down and forcing yourself to write, but, dang, that can be hard, particularly when you've got to build the moon in Katamari Damacy. I mean, dang, the moon is MISSING, don't you SEE? That's SURELY more important than writing some dumb thing about how the new book by E from eels is really fucking awesome, right?
Suzumiya Haruhi's Lover[info]the_terrible on November 19th, 2008 11:51 pm (UTC)
Couldn't have said it better myself. XD
Samuel L. Bronkowitz: David Byrne[info]imiprothrin on November 19th, 2008 02:40 am (UTC)
Criterion has finally started to ship screeners to the website I write for, and I can't be happier. And it only took three years.

And then they sent someone else Brand Upon The Brain!. >:|
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 19th, 2008 02:57 pm (UTC)
hahah, mwomp mwomp. I wish I could get Criterion screeners, but then again, they probably realize that that'd dry up a bunch of their sales. They're not stupid.

Still, though -- I wish I could get on screener lists. Even for folks who aren't Criterion.

Ooh, Other Cinema DVD would be another awesome label to be on the list for. But, again.... and they don't even have 400+ films in their catalog...
chelsea the mod pixie: guy smiley || wileypeter[info]modpixie on November 21st, 2008 10:11 pm (UTC)
THE BRAND UPON THE BRAIN, Y'ALL!
Samuel L. Bronkowitz[info]imiprothrin on November 22nd, 2008 03:27 am (UTC)
AHA. The reviewer who got Brand Upon The Brain! decided to give it to me because he thought it was "almost as boring as The Dark Backward."

Then I beat the shit out of him.

JUSTICE.
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 22nd, 2008 03:40 am (UTC)
Bahahahhahahahahahahah. You were right to do so! Dark Backward may be a lot of things, but boring it is not.
chelsea the mod pixie: isabella rossellini IS lady port-huntley[info]modpixie on November 22nd, 2008 06:25 pm (UTC)
you know, i had happily forgotten about the dark backward. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR REMINDING ME. [/sarcasm]

as much as i love the brand upon the brain! and uncle guy in general (no, really), the film is one of the most questionably paced films ever. it pains me to say this, but i can see someone losing interest towards the middle of the third act. (i loved it, but the only thing that kept my boyfriend awake towards the end was the scene where sis steals chase's gloves.)
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 22nd, 2008 06:34 pm (UTC)
Here's John/Imiprothrin's review of the Dark Backward, the one that made me check the film out. Even though you don't like the film, I recommend his review, just because I think it kind of sums it up -- it's a film that sort of... not really DARES you to like it, but is just sort of "Fuck you" over the whole CONCEPT of liking a film. I loved it -- but I loaned it to Dale, who did NOT; which is kinda funny, as Dale and I have VERY similar film tastes. (I am also interested to give it to Ben, as he's the same way -- our tastes are _almost_ exactly in line.)

I really would like to see that. So far, the only one of Maddin's I've seen is Saddest Music, which I liked, but (and Dale totally disagrees with me) I thought that the casting of Mark McKinney was a mistake -- not that Mark didn't do really well, which he did, but it just sort of took me out of the film a little bit; the concept is kinda similar to some of Bruce's short films in KITH (like "Love & Sausages"), and so Mark being there is sorta... cranking up the KITHness of it -- and it almost seems like you're watching an extended sketch or something? I don't quite know how to phrase the way this takes me out of it. I think that the surrounding film is sort of more Lynch-Comedian, where it's that surreal absurdist, almost nightmarish style of comedy, but with Mark there, it's almost like putting it more into "This Is A Comedy", even though it's... I don't know! ARR! It's a really nebulous kind of feeling about why I don't think he quite worked in the role.
Rev. Syung Myung Me[info]revme on November 30th, 2008 07:37 pm (UTC)
BTW: I don't recall if'n I ever asked or not, but if you ever have any articles that get rejected from DVD In My Pants/any other site, I'd be glad to run 'em at Kittysneezes!